Read the case study on pp. 417-419 of the textbook and answer the following ques

Read the case study on pp. 417-419 of the textbook and answer the following questions:
Would a state anti spam statute that specifically prohibited pornographic, obscene, terroristic, and fraudulent emailing withstand constitutional scrutiny? Why or why not?
Is spam really so bad? Why can a business lawfully send unsolicited traditional mail, or make unsolicited phone calls (as long as their is no violation of a no-call list) but spamming violates the law?

WRITE MY ESSAY

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *