Module 3: Assignment — Prescriptive Authority and Credentialing Due Sunday by 1
Module 3: Assignment — Prescriptive Authority and Credentialing
Due Sunday by 1
Module 3: Assignment — Prescriptive Authority and Credentialing
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 100
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Online Assignment
Assignment: Prescriptive Authority, Credentialing, and DEA Licensing
Part 1: State Prescriptive Authority (MO 1, 3)
Research: Go to the official website of the State Board of Nursing in your state.
Information Gathering: Find and document comprehensive information regarding prescriptive authority for nurses in your specified state. This should include regulations, requirements, and any limitations or specifics.
Reporting: Write a summary highlighting the key points of the prescriptive authority within your state, ensuring to mention specific regulations and requirements and include proper citations.
APA Format: Adhere to APA format guidelines for in-text citations and the reference list.
Part 2: Understanding Drug Schedules (MO 2, 3,5)
Research: Familiarize yourself with the Controlled Substance Act and understand the classifications of Schedule I, II, III, IV, and V drugs.
Differentiation: Describe the differences between these schedules, including examples of drugs falling under each category.
Examples: Provide at least five examples of drugs for each schedule, explaining their uses and restrictions.
APA Format: Adhere to APA format guidelines for in-text citations and the reference list.
Part 3: DEA Licensing Process (MO 4,6,9)
Research: Visit the official DEA website (DEA.gov) to explore the process of obtaining a DEA license for prescribing controlled substances.
Information Gathering: Identify the steps involved in obtaining the license, the initial cost, renewal cost, and the duration of validity for both the initial license and renewals.
Reporting: Write a summary detailing the steps involved in obtaining a DEA license, including costs and validity duration, ensuring proper citations.
APA Format: Adhere to APA format guidelines for in-text citations and the reference list.
Part 4: Summary and AACN Essentials Alignment (MO 7, 8, 10)
Reporting: Write a summary detailing AACN Essentials Alignment. Identify and explain which specific AACN essentials for nursing education and practice are addressed or met by this assignment.
APA Format: Adhere to APA format guidelines for in-text citations and the reference list.
Submission: Submit all work for Parts 1-4 as a single document to the assignment in Canvas.
Part 5: Credentialing Application (M 7, 8, 10)
Completion: Fill out the provided credentialing application form with as much accurate and relevant information as possible. Blank Credentialing Application-1.docx
Submission: Submit the completed application form to the assignment site in Canvas. Note: Do not submit this to an employer.
This form will not need to follow APA format guidelines. All other sections require APA format guidelines.
File Upload
Text Entry
Atomic Learning LTI
CK-12 Practice
JoVE LTI Tool
Office 365
Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
Upload FileUse Webcam Add Another File
Click here to find a file you’ve already uploaded
Cancel Submit Assignment
Rubric
Prescriptive Authority, Credentialing, and DEA Licensing Updated January 2024
Prescriptive Authority, Credentialing, and DEA Licensing Updated January 2024
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: State Prescriptive Authority
15 to >12.0 ptsExceptional
Conducted extensive research and information gathering from credible sources, providing a thorough and well-supported summary highlighting key points
12 to >9.0 ptsAdequate
Conducted adequate research and gathered relevant information, presenting a comprehensive summary
9 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Provided incomplete or inadequate research and information, limited summary
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Understanding Drug Schedules
15 to >12.0 ptsExceptional
Conducted extensive research on drug schedules, classified and differentiated with clear examples
12 to >9.0 ptsAdequate
Adequately researched and provided clear differentiation between schedules with examples
9 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Offered incomplete differentiation or unclear examples
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: DEA Licensing Process
15 to >12.0 ptsExceptional
Conducted comprehensive research on the DEA licensing process, gathered detailed information on steps, costs, and validity, providing a well-summarized process
12 to >9.0 ptsAdequate
Explored and summarized the licensing process effectively, provided comprehensive details and a clear summary
9 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Provided inadequate research, lacked crucial information in the summary
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Summary and AACN Essentials Alignment
11 to >8.8 ptsExceptional
Presented a well-structured summary with AACN essentials alignment, providing clear insights
8.8 to >6.6 ptsAdequate
Offered a coherent summary with alignment details
6.6 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Provided a basic summary with limited alignment information
11 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 5: Credentialing Application
11 ptsFull Marks
Submitted the credentialing application with relevant and accurate information
0 ptsNo Marks
Did not submit
11 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Presentation
11 to >8.8 ptsExceptional
Information presented with exceptional clarity and structure, easy to follow and understand
8.8 to >6.6 ptsAdequate
Clear and well-structured presentation of information
6.6 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Unclear or disorganized presentation of information
11 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Accuracy
11 to >8.8 ptsExceptional
Information presented is highly accurate and reliable
8.8 to >6.6 ptsAdequate
Mostly accurate information presented
6.6 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Information contains numerous inaccuracies
11 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
11 to >8.8 ptsExceptional
Accurate adherence to APA format guidelines for citations and reference list, using 2 or more reliable resources
8.8 to >6.6 ptsAdequate
Mostly followed APA format guidelines for citations and references
6.6 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
No adherence to APA format guidelines for citations and references
11 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext